COGD212 Телесност и познание

Анотация:

• Курсът ще представи подхода на телесност и познание, теорията и емпирични данни.

• Целта е да се получат задълбочени теоретични и практически познания в тази област и да се развие изследователски интерес.

прочети още
Обща психология

Преподавател(и):

доц. Елена Андонова  д-р
гл. ас. Армине Джанян  д-р

Описание на курса:

Компетенции:

Успешно завършилите курса студенти:

1) знаят:

• притежават задълбочени познания за взаимовръзка между телесност и познание на различни нива и в различни когнитивни области;

• познават методологията и изследователските подходи, използвани при изучаването на телесност и познание.

2) могат:

• да обсъждат, прилагат знанията и правят изследвания на механизмите на познанието в рамките на парадигмата имбодимент.


Предварителни изисквания:
• COGM001, COGM007, COGM904, COGM903.

• да имат необходимите познания по английски език за да могат свободно да четат, дискутират и пишат на английски език.



Форми на провеждане:
Редовен

Учебни форми:
Лекция

Език, на който се води курса:
Български

Теми, които се разглеждат в курса:

Литература по темите:

Books

Arbib, M.A. (Ed.) (2006). From action to language via the mirror neuron system. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.

Dehaene, S., Duhamel, J.-R., Hauser, M.D., & Rizzolatti, G. (Eds.). (2005). From monkey brain to human brain. A Fyssen foundation symposium. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Feldman, J.A. (2006). From molecule to metaphor. A neural theory of language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Markman, K.D., Klein, W.M.P, & Suhr, J.A. (Eds.) (2009). Handbook of imagination and mental simulation. NY: Psychology Press.

Pineda, J.A. (Ed.) (2009). Mirror neuron system. The role of mirroring processes in social cognition. NY: Humana Press.

Proctor, R.W., & Vu, K.-P.L. (2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles. Data, theory, and application. NY: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.

Semin, G.R., & Smith, E.R. (Eds.) (2008). Embodied grounding. Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Papers

Ackerman, J.M., Nocera, C.C., & Bargh, J.A. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgements and decisions. Science, 328, 1712-1715.

Almeida, J., Mahon, B.Z., Caramazza, A. (2010). The role of the dorsal visual processing stream in tool identification. Psychological Science, 21(6), 772-778.

Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2010). Wishful seeing: More desired objects are seen as closer. Psychological Science, 21(1), 147-152.

Blaesi, S., & Wilson, M. (2010). The mirror reflects both ways: Action influences perception of others. Brain and Cognition, 72, 306-309.

Boulenger, V, Hauk, O., & Pulvermuller, F. (2009). Grasping ideas with the motor system: Semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19(8), 1905-1914.

Buccino G., Binkofski F., Fink G.R., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Seitz R.J., Zilles K., Rizzolatti G., Freund H.J. (2001) Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 400-404.

Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351-367.

Chaminade, T., Meltzoff, A.N., & Decety, J. (2005). An fMRI study of imitation: Action representation and body schema. Neuropsychologia, 43, 115-127.

Fischer, M.H. & Zwaan, R.A. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 825-850.

Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593-609.

Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8(9), 396-403.

Gentilucci, M., Campione, G.C., Volta, R.D., & Bernardis, P. (2009). The observation of manual grasp actions affects the control of speech: A combined behavioral and transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia, 47, 3190-3202.

Glenberg, A. M. & Kaschak, M. P.(2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9 (3), 558-565.

Glenberg, A.M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., & Buccino, G. (2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 905-919.

Gonzalez, C.L.R., & Goodale, M.A. (2009). Hand preference for precision grasping predicts language lateralization. Neuropsychologia, 47, 3182-3189.

Grafton, S.T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M.A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage, 6, 231-236.

Lee, S.W.S., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1423-1425.

Mahon, B., Schwarzbach, J. caramazza, A. (2010). The representation of tools in left parietal cortex is indepepndent of visual experience. Psychological Science, 21(6), 764-771.

Matlock, T. (2004). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1389–1400.

Pulvermuller, F., M. Haerle, & F. Hummel (2001). Walking or Talking?: Behavioral and Neurophysiological Correlates of Action Verb Processing. Brain and Language, 78, 143–168.

Stanfield, R.A. & Zwaan, R.A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153-156.

Tranel, D., Kemmerer, D., Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A.R. (2003). Neural correlates of conceptual knowledge for actions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3/4/5/6), 409-432.

Turella, L., Pierno, A.C., Tubaldi, F., & Castiello, U. (2009). Mirror neurons in humans: Consisting or confounding evidence? Brain and Language, 108, 10-21.

Willems, R.M., Hagoort, P., Casasanto, D. (2010). Body-specific representations of action verbs: Neural evidence from right- and left-handers. Psychological Science, 21(1), 67-74.

Witt, J.K., Kemmerer, D., Linkenauger, S.A., & Culham, J. (2010). A functional role for motor simulation in identifying tools. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1215-1219.

Zhong, C.-B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451-1452.

Zwaan, R.A., Stanfield, R.A., Yaxley, R.H. (2002). Language comprehenders routinely represent the shapes of objects? Psychological Science, 13, 168-171.

Средства за оценяване: