SODB301 Теория на привързаността
Анотация:
Защо едни са по-големи оптимисти от други? Защо някои хора се справят с предизвикателства по-добре от други? Защо приличаме на нашите родители, дори да не искаме това? На тези въпроси курсът отговаря през основни понятия от теория на привързаносттта, теория, която обяснява как ранните отношения в семейството повлияват базисното усещанe за сигурност и несигурност у хората.
Теория на привързаността предлага знания за това как в най-ранна възраст развиваме умения да разбираме другите и себе си, да поемаме рискове и да създаваме отношения на доверие – умения, които се развиват единствено в семейството – независимо дали то се преживява като добро или не толкова добро.
Курсът обяснява компоненти на привързаността, емоциите , свързани с тях, тяхната проява в поведението на детето и възрастния. Изясняват се процесите на изграждане на психичната структура на индивида чрез връзката възрастен-дете, ефекта на раздялата от семейството и ролята на помагащия професионалист в работа с травмите, свързани с привързаността. Представят се най-новите изследвания в областта на ранното детско развитие и терапевтични програми.
Преподавател(и):
Галина Маркова-Дерелиева д-р
Описание на курса:
Компетенции:
Успешно завършилите курса студенти:
1) знаят:
• компонентите на добрата грижа за деца
2) могат:
• да правят хипотези за поведението на децата и възрастните, базирани на знанията, получени в курса, както и да предлагат терапевтични интервенции за повишаване на чувството на сигурност
Предварителни изисквания:
няма
Форми на провеждане:
Редовен
Учебни форми:
Лекция
Език, на който се води курса:
Български
Теми, които се разглеждат в курса:
Литература по темите:
• Билсън, А., Маркова, Г., Петрова, М. (2002) Оценка на “Заведи ме у дома II”. “Спасете децата”
•
• Томов, Т., Маркова, Г., Чинчева. (2007). Социална работа по случая. Проблеми на Социалната Работа. Образование Практика, Научни Изследвания. ИК-Кота, София. 77-82.
•
• Ainsworth, M.D.S., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
•
• Ainsworth, M.D.S., & Eichberg, C. (1991). Effects on infant-mother attachment of mother’s unresolved loss of an attachment figure, or other traumatic experience. In C.M. Parkes, J. Stevenson-Hinde, & P. Marris (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle (pp. 160-186). London: Routlege.
• Bilson, A. , Markova, G. (2007). But you should see their families: Preventing child abandonment and promoting social inclusion in countries in transition Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 12 (3), 57-78
•
• Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L.M. (1991) Attachment style among young adults. A test of four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226 – 244.
•
• Benoit, D., & Parker, K.C.H. (1994). Stability and transmission of attachment across three generations. Child Development, 65, 444-1456.
•
• Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
•
• Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation. New York: Basic Books.
•
• Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Tavistock.
•
• Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss, Sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.
•
• Brazelton,T.B., & Cramer, B.G. (1990). The earliest relationship: Parents, infants, and the drama of early attachment. Addison-Wesley.
•
• Bretherton, I. (1985). Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment: Theory and research (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Vol. 50, Nos. 1-2, Serial No. 209, pp. 3-35.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
•
• Bretherton, I., & Munholland, K. (1999). Internal working models in attachment relationships. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 89-115). New York: Guilford Press.
•
• Burman, E. (1995). Deconstructing developmental psychology. New York: Routledge.
•
• Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
•
• Cooper, J. (1998). Routes to care. European Children’s Trust..
•
• Dozier, M.; & Tyrrell, C. (1998) The role of attachment in therapeutic relationships, In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.) Attachment theory (pp. 221-248). New York: Guilford Press.
•
• Fonagy, P. (1999). Pathological attachments and therapeutic action. Paper to the Developmental and Psychoanalytic Discussion Group, American Psychoanalytic Association Meeting, Washington DC.
•
• Fonagy, P. (1999). Psychoanalytic theory from the viewpoint of attachment theory and research. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.) Handbook of attachment : theory, research, and clinical applications. New York : Guilford Press.
•
• Freud, S. (1979). An outline of psychoanalysis. New York, W.W. Norton.
•
• George, C., & Solomon, J. (1996). Representational models of relationships: Links between caregiving and attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 17, 198-216.
•
• George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1985). The attachment interview for adults. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
• George, C., & Solomon, J. (1999). The measurement of attachment security in infants and childhood. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 287-318). New York: Guilford Press.
•
• Hesse, E. (1996) Discourse, memory, and the Adult Attachment Interview: A note with emphasis on the emerging cannot classify category. Infant Mental Health Journal, 17, 4–11.
•
• Hesse,E. (1999) The Adult Attachment Interview: Historical and current perspective. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 395-433). New York: Guilford Press.
•
• Karen, R. (1994). Becoming attached : first relationships and how they shape our capacity to love. New York : Oxford University Press.
•
• Land , H. (1979). The changing place of women in Europe, Deadalus, Journal
• of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Spring, 1.
•
• Lieberman, L., Zeanah, C. (1999). Contribution of attachment theory to infant-parent psychotherapy and other interventions with infants and young children. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.). Handbook of attachment : theory, research, and clinical applications. New York : Guilford Press.
•
• Main, M., & Hesse, E. (1990). Parents` unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status: Is frightened and/or frightening parental behavior the linking mechanism? Pp. 161-182. In M. T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti & E. M. Cummings (Eds.) Attachment during the preschool years: Theory, research and intervention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
•
• Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1986). Discovery of an insecure disorganized / disoriented attachment pattern: procedures, findings and implications for classification of behaviour. In M. Yogman & T.B. Brazelton (Ed.), Affective development in infancy (pp 95-124). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
•
• Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In M.T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E.M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment during the preschool years: Theory, research and intervention (pp. 121-160). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
•
• Main, T.F. (1983) The concept of a therapeutic community: Variations and vicissitudes. In Pines, M. (Ed), The evolution of group analysis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
•
• Markova, G. (2002). Analysis of “Take me Home I,” Unpublished Manuscript. Save the Children Fund, UK.Nunev, J. (1997). Roma Families. Unpublished Manuscript
• Menzies, I. (1989) A psychoanalytical perspective on social institutions. In I. Menzies-Lyth, The dynamics of the social. London: Free Association Books.
•
• Minkov, M. (2002). Why are we different. Multicultural differences in family, society, and business. Sofia, Bulgaria: Classic and Style. (In Bulgarian).
•
• Oyen, A., Landy, S., & Hiburn-Cobb, C. (1999). Maternal attachment and sensitivity in an at-risk sample. Attachment and Human Development, 2, 203-217.
•
• Ricks, M.H. (1985). The social transmission of parental behavior: Attachment across generations. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, Serial no. 209, Nos. l-2, pp. 211-227).
• Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J., Pott, M., Miyake, K., & Morelli,G. (2000). Attachment and culture: Security in the United States and Japan. American Psychologist, 55(10), 1093-1104.Olds, D., Henderson, C., Kitzman, J., Eckenrode, J., Cole, R.,Tatelbaum,R. (1999). Prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses: Recent findings, Future of Children, vol. 9,1.
•
• Payn, M. (1997) Modern Social Work Theory . A Critical Introduction. Macmillan, Lyceum Books, Inc.
• Закон за закрила на детето
• Закон за здравето
• Закон за социалното подпомагане
• Конституция на Република България
• Кодекс на труда
• Кодекс за социално осигуряване
• Наредба за експертизата за работоспособността
• Семеен кодекс
Средства за оценяване:
АНАЛИЗ НА КАЗУС ОТ ПРАКТИКАТА
УЧАСТИЕ В СЕМИНАРИ