MHRE112D Talent recruitment and assessment
Анотация:
Purpose:
• Develop an understanding of the influence of the environment on the process of recruitment and selection in the organization;
• Understand the legal and ethical standards of selection and assessment of human resources;
• Evaluate the effectiveness of recruitment methods and selection of the "right people" for the "right job";
• Developing skills to work with various assessment tools for recruitment and selection;
• Analyze the factors that influence the staff selection and evaluation;
• Understand the nature and specificity of the assessment processes, and how to attract and retain talent in the organization.
Преподавател(и):
доц. Елмира Банчева д-р
гл. ас. Мария Тумбева д-р
Описание на курса:
Компетенции:
Students who successfully complete the course:
1) know:
The main objective of this course is to provide students with theoretical and practical knowledge about the processes of recruitment and selection of the "appropriate" staff for the "proper" job.
The course explains and critically evaluates these processes in the context of dynamic changes, the strategy and vision of the organization in accordance with the legal framework, the labor market and of course taking into account the company's philosophy of human capital management in the 21st century.
2) can
Upon successful completion of the course students should be able:
? critically to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the methods of recruitment and selection
? know and use a rich set of tools in the selection process and evaluation
? assess the contribution of different selection methods and assessment for effective implementation;
? demonstrate an understanding of the entire selection process and its contribution to the organization;
? design and implement a system for recruitment and selection adequate for the organization, for the positions, the labor market in accordance with best practice and legislation
Предварителни изисквания:
Students should have knowledge and/ or skills in:
• English reading/ writing skills
• Computer skills (text-processing, worksheets, Internet and e-mail).
Форми на провеждане:
Дистанционен
Учебни форми:
Лекция
Език, на който се води курса:
Английски
Теми, които се разглеждат в курса:
Литература по темите:
Main resource:
Bancheva, E. The process of selection and evaluation of personnel SM-NBU, 2008, ISBN 978-954-535-520-2
Additional resources:
Arthur, W. Jr., Day, E. A., McNelly, T. L., & Edens, P. S. (2003). A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 56, 125-154.
Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., Shiffman, S., Lerner, N., & Salovey, P. (2006). Relating emotional abilities to social functioning: A comparison of self-report and performance measures of emotional intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 780-795
Caldwell, C., Thornton, G. C., & Gruys, M. (2003). Ten classic assessment center errors: Challenges to selection validity. Public Personnel Management, 32(1), 73-88.
Cullen, M. J., & Sackett, P. R. (2004). Integrity testing in the workplace. In J. C. Thomas & M. Hersen (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment, Volume 4: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 149-165). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2000). Personnel selection: Looking toward the future — remembering the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 631-664.
Murphy, K. R., Cronin, B. E., & Tam, A. P. (2003). Controversy and consensus regarding the use of cognitive ability testing in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 660-671.
Pearn, M and Kandola, R (1993) Job analyses: A manager’s guide, 2nd edition, IPD: London
Randall, S. (1997) Managing Human Resources, New York University, South – Western College Publishing
Redman, T. and Wilkinson, A. (2001) Contemporary Human Resource Management, Prentice Hall
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 86(1), 162-173
Testing and Assessment: An Employer's Guide to Good Practices. (2000). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labour, Employment and Training Administration. Note: Article can be accessed at http://www.onetcenter.org/guides.html.
Tolley Harry, Wood R. (2005) How to Succeed at an Assessment Centre, Kogan Page
Woehr, D., & Winfred, A. (2003). The construct-related validity of assessment center ratings: A review and meta-analysis of the role of methodological factors. Journal of Management, 29(2), 231-258.
Useful journals:
? Personnel Psychology
? Journal of applied psychology
? International journal of HRM
? International journal of selection & assessment
Средства за оценяване:
Assessment forms On-going Combined Final exam
Written assignment 50% 50% 50 %
Practical assignment 50% 50% 50%
Additional pre-conditions for forming the final score:
The student can automatically get rid of the continuous assessment tests, if he/she has positive results of the written assignments during the semester and participate in a workshop or fulfill practical tasks (project) during the semester passed through the platform Moodle of NBU.
The evaluation of the students is going through a complex assignment - a written assignment and practical coursework delivered in MOODLE of NBU until the day of the exam in the session. The relative weight of the two components is 50:50.