PMEM106 Управление на човешките ресурси
Анотация:
Students:
• acquire theoretical knowledge and form an understanding of the nature, role and importance of human resource management in the public administration of different coutries;
• get acquainted with modern trends and approaches to human resources management in public administration;
• learn about practices and models of human resource management in the public administration of developed countries.

Преподавател(и):
гл. ас. Мариана Димитрова д-р
Описание на курса:
Компетенции:
After completing successfully this course, the students will:
1) know:
• the context of modern and successful human resources management in public administration;
• modern approaches and techniques for recruitment, training, assessment and development of civil servants;
• the basic framework and legal principles in the field of human resources management in public administration.
2) are capable of:
• distinguishing and interpreting the different concepts of human resources management in public administration;
• evaluating the factors that influence the management of human resources in public administration;
• estimating models for human resources management in public administration;
• determining which approaches are most appropriate for the attraction, assessment and development of civil servants.
Предварителни изисквания:
no
Форми на провеждане:
Редовен
Учебни форми:
Лекция
Език, на който се води курса:
Английски
Теми, които се разглеждат в курса:
Литература по темите:
1. Bossaert. D. (2014). Modernising human resource management in times of financial crisis: What priorities to maintain capacity with limited resources? European Institute of Public Administration. Maastricht. Netherlands. Journal of Human Resource Management 2(1). http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jhrm.20140201.12.pdf
2. Condrey. Stephen E. Handbook of Human Resource Management in Government. Jossey Bass Nonprofit & Public Management Series http://www.untag-smd.ac.id/files/Perpustakaan_Digital_2/PERSONEL%20MANAGEMENT%20Handbook_of_Human_Resources_Management_in_Government_9780787972585.PDF
3. Demmke. C. (2005). Are Civil Servants Different Because They are Civil Servants? European Institute of Public Administration O.L. Vrouweplein 22, P.O. Maastricht. the Netherlands. http://www.eupan.eu/files/repository/02_Are_civil_servants_different_because_they_are_civil_servants.pdf
4. Demmke, C., Henokl, T., Moilanen, T. (2008). What are Public Services Good at? Success of Public Services in the Field of Human Resource Management. Study Commissioned by the Slovenian EU Presidency. University of Helsinki. European Institute of Public Administration. http://www.eupan.eu/files/repository/Success_of_public_services_in_HRM.pdf
5. Demmke, C., Moilanen, T.(2012) The future of public employment in central public administration.EIPA. http://www.eupan.eu/files/repository/2013021293522_Study_The_future_of_public_employment.pdf
6. Bossaert, D. (2008). Training and Human Recourse Development in the European Union Member States: New Practices and Innovative Trends. European Institute of Public Administration.
7. Bossaert, D., Demmke, C., Civil Services in the Accession States: New Trends and the Impact of the Integration Process, 2003, European Institute of Public Administration O.L., Maastricht The Netherlands
8. Daley, D. (2002) Strategic Human Resource Management. People and Performance Management in the Public Sector. North Carolina State University. Pearson education. Prentice Hall. USA
9. Dimitrova, M. (2010). Human resource management policy in public administration in the period of crisis: the case of Bulgaria. Paper for the Nispacee Conference. 2010
10. Dimitrova, M. (2011). Implementation of the performance appraisal system in the Bulgarian public administration. Paper for the Nispacee Conference
11. Mary E. Guy, Janice R. Hitchcock, (2000) If apples were oranges: the public/nonprofit/business nexus in Peter Drucker’s work. Journal of Management History, Vol. 6 Iss: 1, pp.30 - 47
12. Groeneveld, S. (2008) Career development in the Dutch civil service: a diversity perspective. Erasmus University Rotterdam. Department of Public Administration. Paper for the EGPA conference 2008. 3-5 September 2008. Rotterdam. The Netherlands
13. Human Resource Management of Effective Public Administration, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Public Administration and Development Management, 2005, https://publicadministration.un.org/publications/content/PDFs
14. Brenda Vermeeren MSc. , Dr Ben Kuipers, Prof.dr Bram Steijn, Merel Vogelaar. (2006). Human Resource Management and Performance of Public Organizations: A study of HRM activities and public service quality of Dutch municipalities. Paper for the EGPA conference 2008. 4th September 2008. Rotterdam. The Netherlands. Cases in Public Human Resource Management. 2nd Edition. Reeves.
15. Joyce, Paul, Strategic Management for the Public Services, People and Performance Management in the Public Sector, Open University Press, USA, Philadelphia,1999
16. Nutt, Paul C., Robert W. Backoff, Strategic Management of Public and Third Sector Organisations, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1992
17. Pynes, Joan. (2013). Human Resources Management for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. Jossey Bass Nonprofit & Public Management Series.
18. Humphreys. Peter, Worth-Butler, M.(1999). Key Human Resource Management Issues in the Irish Public Service. Committee for Public Management Research Discussion Paper 10.IPA.Dublin. http://www.ipa.ie/pdf/cpmr/CPMR_DP_10_Key_Human_Resource_Management_Issues_Irish_PublicService.pdf
19. White Paper on Human Resource Management in the Public Service, http://www.dpsa.gov.za/dpsa2g/documents/acts®ulations/frameworks/white-papers/pservicedec.pdf
20. www.napawash.org
21. www.oecd.com
22. https://www.premiers.qld.gov.au/publications/categories/policies-and-codes/handbooks/ministerial-handbook/human-resource.aspx
23. http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/careers/behavioural_competencies/mg_human_resources_mgmt.html
Средства за оценяване:
written assignement-40%
essay - 40%
participation in lectures -20%