Преподавател(и):

 Галина Маркова-Дерелиева  д-р

Описание на курса:

Компетенции:

След успешно завършване на курса студентите ще имат:

1) знания за публична сфера, политика и участие

2) умения за критична рефлексия върху темите на курса

3) умения за анализ на политика

4)умения за критичен анализ на литература по темите на курса

5)повишени умения за представяне в група

Предварителни изисквания:
няма

Форми на провеждане:
Редовен

Учебни форми:
Лекция

Език, на който се води курса:
Английски

Теми, които се разглеждат в курса:

1. Въведение : публичната сфера -дефиниция

2. Публичната сфера – пространство за идентифициране на проблем, дебат, развитие на политики.

3. Граждански организации, дискурс и гражданско неподчинение.

4. Публична сфера и обществени медии .

5.Модели за анализ на публичната сфера.

6. Тоталитарно управление, участие и публична сфера.

7. Интернет като публична сфера.

8. Публична сфера и Европейски съюз.

9. Участие, стигма и изключване.

10.Насилие и участие. Справедливост, човешки права и участие.

11. Участие, сигурност и индивидуално развитие.

12. Участие на деца и етични принципи.

13. Политики, базирани на доказателства. Детски права и политика на деинституционализация.

14. Анализ на социална политика .

15. Изследователски методи , базирани на участие

Литература по темите:

Dear Tony,

I hope that you are fine and busy with your exciting projects.

Following our conversation in Sofia about the conference in September , I was thinking that we can use the event for presenting good practices in the field of DI. I wandered whether as a preparation of the event we can distribute guidelines for identifying the best practice in the following DI fields – adoption and foster care for institutionalized children, prevention of institutionalization and reintegration of I child in their biological families.

Задачи – паспорт, предложение за участие на деца за евро дете,

OURSE ANNOTATION AND AIMS:

SYLLABUS:

COURSE ANNOTATION AND AIMS:

SKILLS:

Course Syllabus

Arnstein, S. (1969).A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of

Planners. 35, 4 : 216-24.

Alexandrov, H. (1998). Social participation in post-totalitarian society. Annual of Bourgas Free University, Vol. 1. Bourgas.

Baiocchi, G. (2003). Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance,eds. Archon Fung and Erik Olin Wright. London: Verso Press.

Bilson A (2006) "Rationality, Reflection and Research" in S White, J Fook, F Gardener Critical Reflection And Professional Development: State of the Art OUP

Bilson A. and Westwood J.L. (2012) Making Social Work Work: Improving social work for vulnerable families and children without parental care around the world: A literature review EveryChild, London

Bilson A. (2009) "Use of Residential Care in Europe for Children Aged Under Three: Some Lessons from Neurobiology" British Journal of Social Work 39(7) pp.1381-1392 doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp076

Bilson A. and Markova G. (2007) "But you should see their families: Preventing child abandonment and promoting social inclusion in countries in transition" Social Work and Social Science Review Volume 12, Number 3, 2007 , pp. 57-78

Bilson A. (2007) "International issues in children's participation and protection" Editorial: Special Edition Child Abuse Review Vol. 16: 349-352Cohen, J., Archon, F. (2004). Radical Democracy. Swiss Journal of Political Science, 10, 4.

Bohman , J. (2003)Expanding dialogue: The Internet,the public sphere and prospects for transnational democracy . Sociological review

Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide. New York: The Free Press.

Eriksen, E.,O. (2005). An Emerging European Public Sphere. Journal of Social Theory, 8(3): 341–363

Fiorina, M.(1999). Extreme Voices: A Dark Side of Civic Engagement. Civic Engagement and

American Democracy, ed. Theda Skocpol and Morris Fiorina. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution

Press. 395-426.

Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing

Democracy, in Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Craig Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: MIT

Press. 109-42.

Fung, A. (2003). Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences, Journal of Political Philosophy, 11, 338-67.

Fung, A. (2004). Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy.Princeton: Princeton

University Press.

Goodwin,S (1997). Comparative Mental Health Policy From Institutional to Community Care, SAGE Publications Ltd

Hammond, S. A. Thin Book on Appreciative Inquiry. Plano, Tex.: Thin Book Publishing,1996.

Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category

of Bourgeoise Society.Cambridge: MIT Press.

Habermas,J., Lennox,S., Lennox,F. (1964) The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article

New German Critique, 3. 49-55.

Irvin1, R.A., Stansbury, S.(2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort?

Public Administration Review, 64,1, 55-65.

Keane,J. (1995). Structural transformations of the public sphere, The Communication Review, 1:1,

1-22.

Ferree,M.M., Gamson,A.W., Gerhards,J.,Rucht,D. Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. (2002).Theory and Society, 31: 289-324.

Le Grand, J. (2003) Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens

Lohmann, H. (2011). Comparability of EU-SILC survey and register data: The relationship among employment, earnings and poverty. Journal of European Social Policy February 2011 21: 37-54

MacNeil, C. "Evaluator as Steward of Citizen Deliberation." American Journal of

Evaluation, 2002, 23(1), 45- 54.

Marston, G. and Watts, R. (2003) Tampering with the evidence: A critical appraisal of evidence-based policy-making

Markova, G. (2002). Analysis of "Take me Home I," Unpublished Manuscript. Save the Children Fund, UK.

Mathison, S. "Deliberation, Evaluation, and Democracy." In K. E. Ryan and L. DeStefano

(eds.), Evaluation as a Democratic Process: Promoting Inclusion, Dialogue, and

Deliberation. New Directions for Evaluation, no. 85. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.

Minkov, M. (2002). Why are we different. Multicultural differences in family, society, and business. Sofia, Bulgaria: Classic and Style. (In Bulgarian).

Odell, M. "Beyond the Box": An Innovative Habitat for Humanity Paradigm for Participa-

tory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation-Measuring and Increasing Program Im-

pacts with Appreciative Inquiry. Americus, Ga.: Habitat for Humanity International,

2002.

Oyen, A., Landy, S., & Hiburn-Cobb, C. (1999). Maternal attachment and sensitivity in an at-risk sample. Attachment and Human Development, 2, 203-217.

Rossman, G. B., and Rallis, S. F. "Critical Inquiry and Use as Action." In V. J. Caracelli

and H. Preskill (eds.), The Expanding Scope of Evaluation Use. New Directions for

Evaluation, no. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.

Pascall,G. (1997) Social Policy: A New Feminist Analysis. Routledge

Rondinelli, D. (1993) Development projects as policy experiments: An adaptive approach to development administration

Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J., Pott, M., Miyake, K., & Morelli,G. (2000). Attachment and culture: Security in the United States and Japan. American Psychologist, 55(10), 1093-1104.

Seligman, M.E.P.(1975). Helplessness. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman & Company.

Solesbury, W. (2001) Evidence based policy: Whence it came and where it's going

Social assessment of child care in Bulgaria. (2000). UN Program for development, UN Department of economic and social issues (UNDESA), World bank.

Social Monitoring. (2002). The MONEE Project CEE/CIS Baltics, Unicef Innocenti Research Center, p.17.

Sugareva, M. (1996). Bulgarian family in the transition to the open market economy, Sofia: Free Initiative Foundation. (In Bulgarian).

Sutton, R. (1999) The Policy Process: An Overview

Todorova, V.(1998). The Child Protection Act project: On the reasons of the failure of a legal initiative. Paper, presented at the seminar "Families, Policy and Law, 27-29 May, International Institute of Sociology and Law, Onati, Spain.

Tomov, T. (1995) Social Violence and the Social Institutions. In Human Relations, Authority and Justice: http://human-nature.com/hradj/ttsocvi.html.

Tomov, T., Alexandrov, H., Chihcek, R., and Ivanov, I. (2002), Leadership in Bulgaria: group relations analysis. In 'State of Society'. Sofia: Open Society Institute.

Verschraegen, G., Vanhercke,B., Verpoorten,R. (2011).The European Social Fund and domestic activation policies: Europeanization mechanisms. Journal of European Social Policy

Zhelev, Z.H. (1982). The Fascism. A documentary study of the German, Italian, and the Spanish Fascism. Sofia: Narodna Mladej.Dahl, Robert. Democracy and Its Critics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991).

Средства за оценяване:

Представяне на статия - 30 %

Участие 30 %

Разработване на финално есе 40 %